THIS CONTENT FACILITATES PUBLIC SCRUTINY OF JUDICIAL PROCESS INTEGRITY UNDER FIRST AMENDMENT PROTECTIONS OF PETITIONING GOVERNMENT REDRESS (legal notice at bottom)
WARNING: LEGAL ANALYSIS WITHOUT CONTEXT VIOLATES DUE PROCESS
Any judicial review of this content absent simultaneous consideration of:
(a) Hyperlinked statutes,
(b) Hyperlinked Certiorari Petition Docket #: 24-7363 NOW DISTRIBUTED FOR CONFERENCE 29SEP25,
(c) Excluded trial exhibits,
constitutes void-for-vagueness violation (United States v. Davis, 139 S.Ct. 2319) and selective prosecution (Wayte v. United States, 470 U.S. 598).
Fair notice requires holistic review.
In 2018, this despicable individual KIDNAPPED (or INTERFERED WITH THE CUSTODY OF) a child that lost his mother in 2013 and was living permanently with his father who was active in his life and tending to his grieving needs.
How did she do this?
Using a combination of her own AKA membership, her parents’ Lions memberships, and some home grown selfishness, in 2018 she convinced four family court judges in New Jersey that she adopted this child by showing a void adoption order, when the child’s father never signed the required biological consent, did not participate in any preliminary hearing (required in New Jersey [NJRS 9:3-45(a)], [NJRS 9:3-45(e)], [NJRS 9:3-48(12)(a)(4)], [NJRS 9:3-48(12)(b)]), and was not married when the ‘adoption’ occurred (in any effort to claim stepparent adoption) to award her with custody in spite of the child’s father being in his firstborn son’s life and having a valid custody order promptly after the boy’s mother (and the father’s first wife) passed away mysteriously in 2013!
This wild animal never held standing to petition for the child’s custody, so the courts never held jurisdiction to adjudicate the matter!
And more importantly, WHY???
This dirtbomb styles herself as charismatic, personable, and vivacious to the levels of being inwardly boring, over-the-top, and incredulous. Look at how she takes selfies. She cannot have children. She was unable to conceive from the 3-year marriage she did eventually leave. Personally, I believe this is due to a curse applied to her parents by someone they offended somehow. How is this a curse? Neither of her two siblings can conceive children either. So she steals a child for herself.
Here she is in 2013, dating a man who recently lost his first wife and got custody of their only child, who was seven years old at the time–young enough to establish an emotional connection in the boy, but old enough to be physically independent. And was receiving a survivor’s benefit from his mother’s estate that would supplement the full cost of raising him? A perfect and illegal opportunity to fill the void that God left!
Covering a Thief’s Tracks
As any good narcissist would do, this scumbag made every effort to ensure that the father was economically and emotionally isolated, had distracting legal troubles, strained or edgy relationships with key people in his life, sparse support from friends and family, and difficult communication with nearly everyone he interacted with. Using this information and knowledge, she intentionally spoiled and ruined long-standing relationships with nearly all of the father’s family members and friends she could influence, posing as a pleasant and reasonable woman paired with a misunderstood man as he went through several simultaneous stressful situations, adding yet more to his stress by also being unreasonably overbearing, critical, and demanding behind the scenes!
How did this continue from 2018?
Starting from a power-drunk presiding chancery court judge looking to humble a pro se father that would not yield to demonstrations of power, the first judicial officer failed to complete an ex parte hearing within a reasonable time, executed a double jeopardy during proceedings, denied the same father due process several times (to include avoiding or refusing arraignment within 72 hours after arrest) when he tried to express his position, ordered an unwarranted psychological evaluation, and refused to recuse when the matter was moved into the proper county that all litigants were located (and the ‘adoption’ occurred), believing that her acts would not be exposed because she could use a simple dog whistle term to invalidate any effort to be heard seriously in any way by any judicial officer–“sovereign citizen”, in granting custody of the child to a stranger without seeking alternative family members first. All without jurisdiction, whether due to the abandoned ex parte or the uncovering of contrary official documents that wholly rebut the void adoption order!
I asked Claude Sonnet 3.7…
if a family court issues a 
temporary custody order ex parte, can that court lose jurisdiction if it does not hold a full hearing within 30 days?
- Ex parte orders are temporary in nature and require a subsequent full hearing to allow both parties to present their cases
- Many jurisdictions require hearings within 10-20 days after the ex parte order
I asked Claude Sonnet 3.7…
if the petitioner has no legal standing to bring the matter, does that change?
Yes, lack of legal standing fundamentally changes the analysis.
If the petitioner truly lacks standing, the court never had jurisdiction to begin with, and any orders issued (including ex parte orders) are void regardless of timing of hearings or other procedural requirements.
The second judicial officer worked closely with the first, as they worked within the same chancery. This untalented person approved an adjournment without a reasonable cause, demanded opposing documents after that adjournment yielded none on the court’s record (a feat that would not be offered to the pro se father in any way), refused to recognize nor acknowledge a jurisdictional challenge that was entered on the court’s record both as a motion and in open court, proceeded to conduct an interview with the child without any jurisdiction nor the father’s consent, arrested the father when he refused to cooperate with that court in their attempts to proceed without recognizing the jurisdictional challenge first on intentionally false contempt charges, and ‘legally’ separating the father and son without recourse, without due process, and without jurisdiction! It is expected that he and the first officer cooperated in protecting each other from liability when it was realized that the initial ex parte hearing was not followed by a full hearing, which caused this court to lose its jurisdiction over the matter even without the rebutting documents!
The third judicial officer is also a presiding chancery court judge from the original county of the ‘adoption’. This ambitious sellout coordinated with the first officer at the first hearing calendared before him and ended up hearing the father’s petitions to expose the sealed adoption documents thrice (and heard the trial of a false domestic violence charge against the same father) just to deny each attempt to demonstrate before the court that the adoption order was void! Upon further investigation, it was discovered that this viper participates in more judicial leadership roles and positions of professional influence, all at the national level, than there are hours in a summer day! This genius bought into the biases that the first officer fed him, and used circular reasoning to deny the father due process. A separate false domestic violence charge was heard by this useless individual, where the “victim” was the daughter of a semi-professional associate to him, further influencing him to deny the father due process to prove his innocence, regardless of the victim’s unprovable and gap-filled allegations. It is expected that this rock’s participation exacerbated the protectionism climate due to his level of professional influence versus a mere pro se litigant!
The fourth judicial officer is an associate judge from the second chancery shared with the third officer. She also denied the father due process when he challenged the void adoption order based upon the provably false statements alleged in that void order. Instead of investigating some obvious inaccuracies and other false allegations that could have uncovered the fraud, this shiftless lump chose to turn a blind eye to the void document. It is expected that her participation in this matter piled onto the protectionism already heaped in this matter to keep the existing criminals safe in exchange for her own protection in the scheme!
Did you escalate the matter to attempt to get remedy?
Does shit stink? Let’s explore how many ways was attempted to escalate this clusterfuck…
Uncovering Proof of Forged Signatures
In 2019, the father sought to expose the fraudulent adoption order in the original county of the ‘adoption’ by demonstrating that the biological consent was not signed by the father by asking for copies of the documents that the father signed (which cannot be refused by operation of law, regardless of sealed status) so a professional signature analysis could be ordered. This was unsuccessful at the county level (through the third judicial officer mentioned earlier) and appealed at the state level, which the appeal and every petition to rehear the matter was denied, to include motions for emergency consideration. It is expected that each of the four appellate judges knew the third judicial officer closely and worked to protect that person aggressively by denying all efforts to have the matter heard fairly!
Judicial Review Boards and Offices
In 2021, the father sent official Violation Warning for the Denial of Rights Under Color of Law notices with official court transcript evidence of the acts of the first and second judicial officers to:
- New Jersey Attorney General
- New Jersey Assembly Judiciary committee Chair
- New Jersey Senate Judiciary Committee Chair
- Committee of Codes of Conduct of the Judiciary Conference of the United States
- United States Department of Justice Civil Rights Division
None of these offices responded with helpful or useful information to escalate this situation at all or in any way.
Disproving Statements and Allegations of the Void Order
In 2022, the father decided to disprove the void order on its own statements and claims after seeing that the courts and agencies refused to expose proof of the forgery. Aside from the signature on the biological consent, every other claim or statement was disproved by government offices that provide that accurate information, to include New Jersey state law and legislated regulations. Finally, the father was successful, but now needed to hold the officers and agents that broke the law accountable!
Escalating To a Higher Jurisdiction
As soon as the evidence and proof of the fraudulent adoption was aggregated, the father filed a civil complaint in the federal district court. Unfortunately, the judge refused to see or understand the clear statements of the complaint and decided instead to take 18 days to bail out her fellow judges and special masters with an unreasonably bifurcated dismissal with prejudice that spanned a full year before issuing a final order, but only after a petition to rehear a mandamus with the 3rd circuit appellate court was complained to for using circular reasoning in issuing its initial denial. It is expected that this federal judge intentionally forced the father in a legal limbo with no recourse where he could not proceed with any court due to the bifurcated dismissal, as a likely punitive measure for naming a national figure in her industry and vocation (and more believably, a personal friend) as a defendant that would be held personally liable for breaking the very law he entered oaths to uphold and protect!
Not to mention that both the federal judge and the appellate court went against two precedential cases from the same circuit that both overcome the main excuse to not hear the case!
Now in 2025, after the appellate refused to rehear the matter when the proof and evidence of the jurisdictional void ab initio was sent, the matter was further escalated to the Supreme Court of the United States for certiorari! Here, the petition was rejected seven times before FINALLY being DOCKETED as Case #: 24-7363! The case has NOW BEEN DISTRIBUTED FOR CONFERENCE FOR 29SEP25!
Why Didn’t You Report This To Local Police?
The legal answer is that because the child is a minor, the matter is obviously a custody issue, and needs to be dealt with in family court. While the family court maintains jurisdiction (decision-making) in the matter, this prevents them from acting on such allegations.
The public (or layman’s) answer is that law enforcement typically will not hold judicial officers accountable unless public outcry exists and will not be silenced without sanctions being enforced. This translates to police departments refusing to arrest magistrates, sheriffs deputies refusing to arrest county judges, state police refusing to arrest state judges, and marshals refusing to arrest federal judges and magistrates. Instead, they will protect their own by claiming “professional courtesy” or sabotaging the investigation effort or refusing to act at all.
Once the family court loses jurisdiction (or all presumptions of jurisdiction, typically by some type of legal emancipation), then these agents can be held accountable for such actions without the presumptions that cause law enforcement to automatically defer back to the family courts, and maybe law enforcement can do their jobs!
Reporting Fraud to Key Agencies
As soon as the proof of the challenging documentation was aggregated at the end of 2024, the same proof was hand delivered to Social Security Administration to encourage an investigation for switching the payee on the child’s survivor benefits from the father to the kidnapper. The agency has not responded to date, not even to inquire for details.
A few days apart, a copy of this evidence was mailed and emailed to New Jersey’s Department of Health Office of Vital Statistics and Registry to encourage an investigation of the child’s fraudulent birth certificate in that agency. The agency refused and suggested filing a police report instead.
What about your inner circle?
Oh, you mean family and friends? You have better clues than I do.
But just as with the Shanquella Robinson case, the father’s family and friends showed their true worth in their willingness to buy into the lies and fraud by refusing to question the liars, refusing to validate what happened with the father, not listening to the father when he uncovered the truth, and treating the father as if he were irrelevant to the boy’s life!
And because of their inability (or unwillingness) to think or act, they decided that the courts “knew what they were doing” by illegally separating the father and son instead of demanding more from these public servants, regardless of many of them knowing the father for over 30 years at the time.
Here is a message for them all: Karma knows your address and will not knock when it visits!
And to those who speak on the father, the son, or this situation negatively: You will be witnessed falling, failing, and losing everything you’ve worked for by a front row filled with hammocks and iced lemonade glasses in hand!
Wasting time and opportunities
From failing to hold a full hearing after ex parte in 2018 to bifurcating a decision by a year without justification for doing so to using circular reasoning for mandamus to moving the goalposts for docketing a petition for an extraordinary writ, it seems that every level of justice is not about justice. It seems to be about nepotisms and inner circles of judiciary officers that refuse to give a pro se litigant his proper day to hold the real offenders accountable in court!
For all the talk about pro se expressions and filings being enforced to being “construed liberally”, not much liberation is afforded any pro se effectively enough. And the talk sounds like Charlie Brown’s teacher. I was raised to believe that if you can dish it, you can take it!
Recognizing criminals and their acts
At the very beginning of 2025, after realizing that the civil suit would not automatically convert into a criminal suit, the father attempted to submit a completed criminal complaint with its evidences that detailed all of the acts of the agents and officers that have participated, perpetuated, and permitted these crimes to continue to keep a son that lost so much in his life so early from his father, who continues to seek to correct these misdeeds and hold those liable in any way accountable. This complaint was hand delivered to the local United States Attorney’s office and mailed to Federal Bureau of Investigation at the same time. It is hoped and prayed that both offices take the 80-page documentation seriously!
Who was injured?
Time and opportunity for both the father and son have been spoiled and stolen. No man can give either, and no God will give back time already spent.
The son was kidnapped from (or interfered with the custody of) his father at the age of 14 by the second judicial officer. This age is critical in a boy’s life for him to be able to experience his father directly and without interruption in order to shape and prepare him for a productive and meaningful adulthood. The father missed the son’s:
- middle school graduation and celebrations
- high school selection, enrollment, school performances and events, graduation and celebrations
- college touring, selection, and campus move in
- first employment
- first banking
- first dating relationships/socializing
- self development/improvement
- learning how to use public transportation and navigate
- learning how to drive, applying for driver’s license, and travel negotiation
- opportunities for further world travel/exposure
- landmark birthdays, to include the boy’s 18th and 21st
Injuries incurred by father and/or son
18 USC § 4 – Misprision of felony: a person with knowledge of the commission of a felony conceals and does not make known the same acts to a civil or military authority
18 USC § 242 – Civil Rights Violations: acting under color of law to willfully deprive constitutional rights, deprivation of parental rights, denial of due process, preventing access to evidence, protecting a fraudulent scheme, and financial gain through fraud
18 USC § 371 – Conspiracy: coordination between multiple parties, agents, and officers to accomplish all crimes listed
18 USC § 1001 – False Statements: regarding relationship status, about notice and consent, fraudulent adoption documents, and a pattern of misrepresentation
18 USC § 1028A – Aggravated Identity Theft: unauthorized use of the child’s information on insurance policies, to obtain tax credits, education applications and events, medical decisions and procedures, and other tasks typical of parents
18 USC § 1201 – Kidnapping: travelling with the child or causing the child to travel beyond his state of residence without his parent’s knowledge or permission or authorization, with or without 3rd party coordination
18 USC §§ 1341, 1343 – Mail/Wire Fraud: used mail and electronic systems to file fraudulent adoption documents, submitting false statements, processing fraudulent orders, and maintaining a fraudulent scheme
18 USC § 1519 – Obstruction of Justice: concealment of evidence, denial of access to records, prevention of a proper review, pattern of obstruction, maintaining sealed status of fraudulent documents, preventing access to evidence, and protection of a fraudulent scheme
42 USC § 1983 – Civil Rights Violations: deprivation of constitutional rights, protection of fraud, and denial of due process
What is an appropriate punishment?
The only meaningful punishments available are those that come from each violator’s personal currency. This is typically expressed in resources and freedoms.
Judicial officers, to include the initial judge that signed the fraudulent adoption, have their careers and opportunities that that career affords. Permanent disbarment is appropriate for these individuals to fully respect what was taken from the father and his firstborn son. Instant loss of immunities are another appropriate punishment for committing these acts. Incarceration is also appropriate for specific individuals that committed the most heinous of these acts. Each of their earnings and income and contributions collected or pledged, to include that of their staff for the duration of the fraud should be awarded in retribution to the victims–tripled. Being that they are responsible for so many additional adjacent and subordinate agencies and offices with their related decisions and acts, they should be held liable for those same agents’ earnings, income, and otherwise compensation for the duration of the fraud–tripled. The initial judge that signed the fraudulent adoption’s accolades and professional credits should be voided, rescinded, and destroyed.
Government agents, to include law enforcement officers also have careers and opportunities that their careers afford. Agents that have committed criminal acts should be awarded with incarceration. Being that these agents are subject the same legislation, they should be held to the same punishments minus the immunities they normally enjoy when doing things in their official capacity. Additional sanctions may include permanent bars to their industry or professional consideration of their previous history (firearms, badges, and access to the resources of adjacent or supporting agencies) as it seems they cannot be entrusted to do their jobs when no one else is looking over their shoulders.
Attorneys should be permanently disbarred without recourse. Attorney client privilege is not an excuse for covering up a crime, which by itself should earn each attorney consecutive incarceration without the possibility of parole for each charge. Additional sanctions should include incarceration and permanent ineligibility for expungement. These should also be permanently barred from all fraternal or sororal associations or otherwise affiliations.
Family members, friends, and associates who failed to report, dissuade, or otherwise facilitate the father and son’s reunification should have permanent and irrevocable full restraining orders placed upon them all. All media they may have in their possession that features of includes the victims, to include social media posts should be scrubbed from all devices they are, or have ever been, in control of, to include all online accounts. These have earned the removal of their memories of the father and son.
The kidnapper has bitten the hand that fed her–no woman can become a mother without the father’s permission and consent–even an adoption! She has earned the removal of the ability to bite. She has lied to get what she wanted. She has earned the removal of the ability to speak. She has taken with her hands what was not hers to take. She has earned the removal of the ability to grasp and grab. She has traveled with someone she did not the authority to travel with. She has earned the removal of the ability to walk. She used powerful and influential people to get this fraud done and to keep the fraud in place. She has earned permanent isolation from all humanity. Her punishment must endure for as long as she is destined to live. She has earned the removal of the ability to die.
And in case you think this page is eligible for defamation or slander
I alone hold a trademark of the name. It is not your birthname, thief!
And no one else is named here either, monkeys!
You must be logged in to post a comment.